Quest for Legislative Intervention in Stem Cell Research and Therapy in Nigeria: Lessons from United Kingdom and South Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52609/jmlph.v6i2.251Keywords:
Biomedical Research, Cell and Tissue Based Therapy, Humans, Nigeria, South Africa, Stem Cell ResearchAbstract
Introduction: Stem cell research, which examines the therapeutic applications of human stem cells for disease treatment, is actively conducted worldwide. In response to this, many jurisdictions have developed regulatory frameworks that define permissible stem cell applications and establish mechanisms for compliance. Nigeria is yet to enact such laws, though reports indicate that a small number of stem cell research centres do operate in the country. In the absence of regulation, unethical practices may thrive. This study examined regulatory approaches to stem cell research in the United Kingdom (UK) and South Africa and assessed stakeholder perspectives on stem cell research in Nigeria.
Materials & Methods: The study adopted a qualitative approach and a multi-stage recruitment strategy to identify and document the opinions of 30 stakeholders from Lagos, Oyo, and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), using in-depth and key informant interview guides.
Results: The study found that a permissive legal framework, strictly implemented, has enhanced stem cell research in the UK, while South Africa has a more liberal framework that is not strictly implemented. The latter has encouraged unethical practices leading to increased stem cell tourism in South Africa. Findings from stakeholders in Nigeria showed apathy towards stem cell research among some, although the majority supported its practice in Nigeria subject to necessary regulation.
Conclusion: Based on the study’s findings, a permissive legal regime is preferable to a restrictive one for stem cell research in Nigeria, provided it is supported by clear enforcement and effective regulatory oversight.
References
Ghasroldasht M, Seok J, Soo Park H, Al-Hendy A, Park F. Stem cell therapy: from ideas to clinical practice. Int J Mol Sci [Internet]. 2022;23:2850. [cited 2025 Jan 28]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35269990/
Lei T, Jacob S, Ajil-Zaraa I. Xeno-free derivation and culture of human embryonic stem cells: current status, problems and challenges. Cell Res [Internet]. 2007;17:682–8. [cited 2025 Jan 28]. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17667917/
Devolder K. The ethics of embryonic stem cell research. In: Harris J, Soren H, editors. Issues in biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
Slack JM. Stem cell. Encyclopaedia Britannica [Internet]. Chicago (IL): Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.; [cited 2022 Mar 7]. Available from: http://www.britannica.com/science
Irving DN. Stem cell research: some pros and cons [Internet]. 1999. Available from: http://www.lifeissues.net/writers/irv/irv_19stemcellprocon.html. Accessed 2022 Mar 12.
Oosthuizen H. Legal and ethical issues in stem cell research in South Africa. In: Beran RG, editor. Legal and forensic medicine. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2013.
Center for Health and Biosciences. Drawing the line: ethical, policy and scientific perspectives on US embryo research [Internet]. 2019. Available from: http://www.bakerinstitute.com. Accessed 2025 Apr 10.
Ugwunga C, Mercy N, Okechukwu J, Nwakwasi U. Cost of stem cell therapy: accessibility is a major challenge for stem cell transplant in Nigeria. J Complement Altern Med Res. 2021;14(3):7–17. Available from: https://www.sdiarticle4.com/prh/doc/Ms_JOCAMR_68516.pd
Nothling-Slabbert M, Pepper MS, Mahomed S. Stem cell tourism in South Africa: a legal update. South African Journal of Bioethics and Law. 2015;8(2):41-46. doi:10.7196/SAJBL.8006..
Gaobotse G. Stem cell research in Africa: legislation and challenges. J Regener Med. 2018;7:1. doi:10.4172/2325-9620.
Lovell-Badge R. The regulation of human embryo and stem cell research in the United Kingdom. Nat Rev Mol Biol. 2009;9(12):998–1003. doi:10.1038/nrm2550.
Thaldar DW, Shozi B. The legal status of human biological material used for research. S Afr Law J. 2021;138:881–907. doi:10.47348/SALJ/v138/i4a9.13
Du Bois F. Introduction to South African law: history, system and sources. In: Van der Merwe CG, Du Plessis JE, editors. Introduction to the law of South Africa. South Africa: Kluwer Publishers; 2004.
Encyclopaedia Britannica. Federal Capital Territory. In: Encyclopaedia Britannica [Internet]. 2016. Available from: https://www.britannica.com/place/Abuja. Accessed 2025 Apr 11.
Laurie GT, Harmon SH, Dove ES. Mason and McCall Smith’s law and medical ethics. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2019.
United Kingdom. Human Embryology and Fertilisation Act 1990, c. 37, §5.
United Kingdom. Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Research Purposes) Regulations 2001, SI 2001/188. §2(2).
Steering Committee on Human Cell Research. Code of practice for the use of human cell lines. London: Medical Research Council; 2010 [cited 2025 Apr 11]. Available from: https://mrc.ukri.org
United Kingdom Parliament. Debate in the House of Lords, 22 January 2001 [Internet]. London: UK Parliament; 2001 [cited 2022 Mar 15]. Available from: https://api.parliament.uk
Morgan RA. Tight fit? Deficiencies in the Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Research Purposes) Regulations 2001. Statute Law Rev. 2007;28(3):199–217. doi:10.1093/slr/hmm008.
United Kingdom Parliament. Explanatory notes to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 [Internet]. London: UK Parliament; 2008 [cited 2025 Apr 11]. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk
Jones C. The HFEA 2008: promoting wider access to information about genetic origin. Bionews [Internet]. [cited 2025 Apr 12]. Available from: http://www.bionews.org.uk
United Kingdom. Review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act: Proposals for revised legislation (including establishment of the Regulatory Authority for Tissue and Embryos) [Internet]. London: Department of Health; 2006 [cited 2025 Apr 12]. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/272391/6989.pdf
Wood L, Haveman J, Juritz J, Waldman H, Hale G, Jacobs P. Immunohematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Cape Town: a ten-year outcome analysis in adults. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther. 2009;2(2):320–32. doi:10.1016/S1658-3876(09)50020-9.
Viljoen IM, Hendricks CL, Malherbe HL, Pepper MS. Regenerative medicine: a new regulatory paradigm for South Africa. Biochimie. 2022;196:123–30. doi:10.1016/j.biochi.2022.02.010.
South Africa. National Health Act 61 of 2003, Schedule I.
Ajagunna FO. Informed consent and ethical considerations in assisted reproductive technology in Nigeria: options and challenges. In: Reproductive Health and Assisted Reproductive Technologies in Sub-Saharan Africa: Issues and Challenges. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore; 2023. p. 235–56.
Pepper MS, Gouvella C, Nothling-Slabbert M. Legislation governing pluripotent stem cells in South Africa. S Afr J Bioeth Law. 2015;8(2):23.
South Africa. Medicines and Related Substances Control Act 101 of 1965, s. 2.7.5.
Pepper MS, Nothling-Slabbert M. Human tissue legislation in South Africa: focus on stem cell research and therapy. S Afr J Bioeth Law. 2015;8(2):4.
Botes WM, Alessandrini M. Legal implications of translational promises of unproven stem cell therapy. S Afr J Bioeth Law. 2015;8(2):36–40.
Mnisi FM. A critique of the application of the principle of subsidiarity concerning human embryonic stem cell research in South Africa. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2016;4:472–85.
House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. Science and Technology Committee: Evidence on Stem Cells [Internet]. London: UK Parliament; 2009 [cited 2025 Jan 28]. Available from: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmsctech/220/220.pdf
Levine AD. Identifying under and over performing countries in research related to human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;2:521–4. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2008.05.008.
Bahadur G. The moral status of the embryo: the human embryo in the UK Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Research Purposes) Regulation 2001 debate. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;7(1):12–16. doi:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61722-1.
Kollu L. Stem cell research ethico-legal perspectives: protection of human embryos. Int J Curr Res Rev. 2021;13(7):216–22. doi:10.31782/IJCRR.2021.13706.
EuroStellCell. Regulation of stem cell research in the United Kingdom. 2015 [cited 2025 Jan 28]. Available from: https://www.eurostemcell.org/regulation-stem-cell-research-united-kingdom.
Meissner-Roloff M, Pepper M. Curbing stem cell tourism in South Africa. Appl Transl Genomics. 2013;2: [page numbers if available]. doi:10.1016/j.atg.
Fadel HE. Developments in stem cell research and therapeutic cloning: Islamic ethical position, a review. Bioethics. 2012;26(3):128–35.
Saniei M. Human embryonic stem cell research in Iran: the role of the Islamic context. SCRIPTed. 2010;7(2):324–34. doi:10.2966/scrip.070210.324.
Kamali MH. Principles of Islamic jurisprudence. Cambridge: Islamic Texts Society; 1991.
Fadel HE. A review of the rulings by Muslim jurists on assisted reproductive technology and reproductive tissue transplantation. Religions (Basel) [Internet]. 2021;12(9):720. [cited 2025 Jan 28]. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/12/9/720.
Contijoch Y. Embryonic stem cell research according to Islamic texts and beliefs [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2022 Jun 8]. Available from: http://www.bioethicsnet.org
Pepper MS, Labushaigne M. A global comparative overview of the legal regulation of stem cell research and therapy. S Afr J Bioeth Law. 2015;8:2–12.
Bin Abdul Aziz MF, Nothling-Slabbert M, Pepper MS, Mahomed S. Stem cell tourism in South Africa: a legal update. S Afr J Bioeth Law. 2015;8(2):41–46.
Pennings G. Decisional authority of gamete donors over embryos created with their gametes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37(3):731.
Anthony AA. Regulating the medical profession in Nigeria: the Medical and Dental Practitioners Council in perspective. AIPGG J Humanit Peace Stud. 2021;2(1):119–45.
Lyons S, Salgaonkar S, Flaherty GT. International stem cell tourism: a critical literature review and evidence-based recommendation. Int Health J. 2022;14(2):132–41.
Nothling-Slabbert M, Pepper MS. A global comparative overview of the legal regulation of stem cell research and therapy: lessons for South Africa. S Afr J Bioeth Law. 2015;8:2–12.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Folakemi Ajagunna, Omolade Olomola
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) is a flexible and commonly used license that allows others to share, remix, adapt, and build upon the work even for commercial purposes, as long as they follow the requirements outlined by the license.
