Original Articles Vol. 3 No. 4 (2023): Oct-Dec Open access

Assessment of the Efficiency of Virtual Clinics in Hail Hospitals, Saudi Arabia

Omar Habib Alshammari, Hasna Mohammed Al-towhere, Anwar Bstan Alanazi, Arwa Sami AlFuhaid, Khuzama Ibrahim AlMoammar, Abdullah Atef Al-Ruwaidi, Naif Hammad Alshammari, Mohamed Ali AlzainiD
  • Health Informatics, King Fahd Medical City and College of Public Health and Health Informatics, University of Hail, Saudi Arabia.
  • College of Public Health and Health Informatics, at University of Hail, Saudi Arabia.
  • College of computing and digital media at Depaul University, USA.
  • College of Public Health, Department of Health Information Management and Technology, Imam Abdulrahman bin Faisal University, Saudi Arabia.
  • College of Public Health and Health Informatics, University of Hail, Saudi Arabia.
Published
November 26, 2023
Pages
289-294
Licence
CC BY 4.0

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.52609/jmlph.v3i3.94

Full text rendered from the published PDF. The PDF is the version of record; if the two differ, the PDF governs.

Abstract

Introduction:

Virtual clinics have emerged as a viable alternative to traditional face-to-face medical consultations, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study aims to evaluate the efficiency of virtual clinics by examining the satisfaction of patients and healthcare providers and their opinions of the virtual clinic service.

Method:

Data were collected using two separate questionnaires—one distributed to patients and the other to healthcare providers, between January 2023 and October 2023.

Results:

The analysis revealed that patients, regardless of their demographics, preferred virtual clinics due to reduced waiting times (43.9%), easy access to healthcare professionals (36.7%), and the convenience of receiving medical advice from home (19.8%). Healthcare providers also favoured virtual clinics as they reduced workloads and improved accessibility to health services. However, concerns were identified regarding the limitations of telemedicine in conducting physical examinations and technological barriers for physicians and patients.

Conclusion:

Based on the findings, it is recommended that healthcare providers and patients be encouraged to maximise the use of telemedicine services. Efforts should be made to address barriers, such as technological challenges, and to ensure that appropriate measures are taken to overcome limitations related to physical examinations. By embracing virtual clinics and removing barriers, healthcare delivery can be improved, leading to increased patient satisfaction and reduced provider workload.

Keywords: Access to Care, Hail Region Hospitals, Healthcare Outcomes, Remote Healthcare, Telemedicine, Virtual Clinics

Introduction

Virtual clinics have emerged as a potential so- lution to improve healthcare delivery, especially during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic [1]. By leveraging telehealth technology, virtual clinics allow patients to connect remotely with healthcare professionals, eliminating the need for an in-person visit. The COVID-19 pandemic [2] has accelerated the global adoption of telemedicine and virtual health services, including in Saudi Arabia. In this context, the aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of virtual clinics in hospitals in the Hail region of Saudi Arabia and SEHA Virtual Hospital. SEHA is a pioneering healthcare institution that to services leverages telehealth provide cutting-edge medical care. It aims to enhance virtual healthcare, promote innovation, and drive digital transformation throughout the Kingdom. With wide coverage and a focus on equitable access, SEHA ensures that specialised health services can reach all regions timeously. By supporting modern technologies and fostering knowledge exchange, SEHA contributes to the quality and efficiency of healthcare services while striving for institutional excellence. As a priority initiative in the health sector transformation program, SEHA is at the forefront of promoting and medicine virtual top delivering -notch virtual services health nationally.

The adoption of virtual clinics in the Hail region could have a significant impact on healthcare access and patient outcomes, and it is therefore crucial to assess the effectiveness of this approach and understand its potential benefits and challenges. The availability of current references and existing literature is helpful to contextualise this study and provide a comprehensive background on virtual clinics.

Virtual clinics are gaining traction as an effective means of providing medical services while minimis- ing physical contact and reducing the risk of virus transmission. However, a thorough evaluation of their efficiency is necessary in the specific context of the Hail region. By examining the implementation and outcomes of virtual clinics in this region, we can contribute to the existing body of knowledge and inform healthcare policies and practices.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was carried out to evaluate patient and healthcare provider satisfaction with virtual clinics in the Hail Health Cluster, which includes 13 hospitals that aim to serve 2,000 patients per week. The main primary healthcare centres are King Salman Specialist Hospital and King Khalid Hospital, which include family medicine clinics along with speciality clinics such as paediatric, obstetrics and gynaecology, general surgery, dermatology, ear, nose, and throat (ENT), and ophthalmology.

Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Hail on August 18, 2023, and informed consent was obtained from all the participants. The study included patients and healthcare providers who par- ticipated in at least one virtual visit between January 2023 and October 2023. Convenience sampling was used, including all eligible participants. Patients include those who have used virtual clinics at Hail area hospitals and are aged 18 years or older. Healthcare providers include those with experience working in virtual clinics and currently practising in selected hospitals. Excluded from the study were patients who did not use virtual clinics at hospitals in the Hail region, healthcare

providers with no experience with virtual clinics, patients receiving medical treatment at hospitals outside the Hail area, and patients under 18 years of age. Two online surveys were used: one for patients and one for healthcare providers. The patient questionnaire was adapted from a previous study conducted in the United States [3]. It was translated into Arabic, tested with 50 patients via WhatsApp, and then formally administered to 220 participants. The patient questionnaire includes demographic questions (gender, nationality, place of residence, age, social status, and occupation), questions related to the COVID-19 pandemic, and questions specifically related to virtual clinics. The healthcare provider questionnaire was adapted from a previous study [4] and tested with 10 physicians via WhatsApp before being officially applied to 79 doctors. The questionnaire included demographic questions (age, gender, educational level, years of experience in the medical field, and field of expertise), as well as questions about satisfaction with medical facilities in the process of using virtual clinics and the obstacles encountered.

Collected data were analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0. Descriptive analysis included calculated frequencies and percentages for categorical variables, and the mean, medians, and standard deviations for contin- uous variables. Satisfaction scores between groups were compared using nonparametric tests such as the Mann-Whitney U test and the Kruskal-Wallis test. A significance level of 0.05 was used for the tests.

III. RESULT

Analysis of the gathered data unveiled several noteworthy discoveries. Firstly, it was ascertained that a significant majority of the respondents (n = 197) fell within the 18-29 age bracket, accounting for 53.6% of the total respondents [Figure 1]. Moreover, the majority of participants, approxi- mately 82.9% (n = 184), were Saudi nationals, while a small fraction (1.4%) belonged to the non-Saudi category.

When examining the utilisation of virtual clinic services, government employees emerged as the

most frequent users, accounting for 52.7% of respo- ndents (n = 107), followed by students at 23.4%.

Convenience and time efficiency were identified as the primary factors influencing the preference for virtual clinics, with 58.2% of participants expressing their inclination towards this mode of healthcare delivery. However, a notable subset of respondents (28.6%) still favoured in-person visits, citing the necessity of physical check-ups and face-to-face interaction [Table 1].

In terms of patient satisfaction, a substantial 75.3% of respondents reported contentment with their virtual clinic experience. Factors contributing to this satisfaction included reduced waiting times (43.9%), easy access to healthcare professionals (36.7%), and the ability to receive medical advice from the comfort of their homes (19.8%). Conversely, a small proportion of patients (4.3%) expressed dissatisfaction, primarily due to technical challenges or a perceived lack of personalised care [Table 2] [Table 3].

With regard to the healthcare provider question- naire, 61.2% of providers reported that virtual clin- ics have proved instrumental in reducing their work- load. This reduction was attributed to the ability to remotely manage a greater number of patients and eliminate unnecessary in-person visits. However, a

subset of healthcare providers (22.9%) experienced an increased workload due to the necessity of adapt- ing to new technologies and additional administra- tive tasks [Table 4]. Virtual clinics have yielded potential savings for both patients and healthcare providers alike.

Patients benefited from reduced travel costs (45.7%) and avoiding time off from work (32.1%). Healthcare providers, on the other hand, enjoyed financial savings through reduced installation and operational expenses (39.2%) and the capacity to serve larger patient populations without the re- quirement for supplementary physical infrastructure (26.8%). Regrettably, both patients (38.5%) and healthcare providers (42.1%) encountered technical issues such as poor internet connectivity and subpar audio/video quality. Furthermore, limitations with regard to physical examination capabilities (29.6%) and remote diagnosis for certain conditions (16.7%) were identified as barriers to comprehensive care [Table 5]. Nevertheless, virtual clinics possess the potential to enhance healthcare delivery and increase patient satisfaction. Recommendations include in- vesting in a robust telemedicine platform and infras- tructure, providing educational programs for both patients and healthcare providers, addressing con- cerns regarding privacy and quality of care, and

Patient satisfaction with virtual clinic services was high, with reduced wait times, easy access to health- care professionals, and the convenience of receiving medical advice at home being major contributing factors. This suggests that the virtual clinics in the Hail Region have implemented effective practices resulting in higher patient satisfaction. However, a small proportion of respondents expressed dissatis- faction, mainly due to technical difficulties and a perceived lack of personalised care. This indicates that, while virtual clinics have made significant strides, there is still room for improvement in terms of user experience and service quality.

Our findings also shed light on the impact of virtual clinics on healthcare providers. A significant percentage of providers reported a reduction in workload due to the adoption of virtual clinics, as they were able to manage more patients remotely and eliminate unnecessary in-person visits. This aligns with the one article [5] that also demonstrated a decrease in workload with the implementation of digital health services. However, it is worth noting that a considerable proportion of providers in our study reported an increased workload. This differs from the one article [6] which showed no significant change in provider workload. The increased work- load reported in our study can be attributed to the need for healthcare providers to adapt to new tech- nology and handle additional administrative tasks associated with virtual clinics. These contrasting findings suggest that the impact of virtual clinics on provider workload may vary across different healthcare settings. Therefore, it is crucial to provide proper training and resources to support healthcare providers in the transition to digital health services. Trust in the authenticity of information provided through virtual clinics emerged as an important factor. The majority of respondents expressed high levels of trust in teleclinic services, demonstrating confidence in the ability of healthcare professionals to provide accurate and trustworthy medical advice from afar. However, concerns were raised about the accuracy and quality of healthcare provided through virtual clinics, emphasising the need for clear and transparent communication from health- care providers to address these concerns and build trust in the virtual clinic model. Ensuring the security and privacy of patient data is crucial in virtual clinics,

Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into the efficiency and acceptance of virtual clinics in the Hail Region of Saudi Arabia. The majority of re- spondents expressed a preference for virtual clinics, highlighting their convenience and time-saving potential. Patient satisfaction with virtual clinic services was high, with reduced wait times and easy access to healthcare professionals being major contributing factors. However, a small proportion of respondents expressed dissatisfaction, mainly due to technical difficulties and a perceived lack of personalised care.

of The study also revealed the impact virtual clinics on healthcare providers. A significant percentage reported a reduction in workload, while others experienced an increased workload due to the need to adapt to new technology and additional administrative tasks.

Trust in the authenticity of information provided through virtual clinics emerged as an important factor. The majority of respondents expressed high levels of trust in teleclinic services, but concerns were raised about the accuracy and quality of health- care provided.

In conclusion, virtual clinics offer many benefits, including convenience, speed, and reduced costs for both patients and healthcare providers. However, challenges such as technical issues, limitations in physical examination capabilities, and concerns about privacy and quality of care need to be ad- dressed. Investments in telemedicine platforms and infrastructure, educational programs, and regulation are necessary to overcome these challenges. De- spite the obstacles, virtual clinics have demonstrated their potential to improve healthcare delivery and increase patient satisfaction. Continued research and innovation in telemedicine can further enhance the capabilities of virtual clinics and promote better health outcomes. By addressing the challenges and investing in the necessary infrastructure and reg- ulations, virtual clinics can play a transformative role in the future of healthcare, providing effective and efficient care for those in need, and increasing patient satisfaction.

Limitations

It is important to acknowledge certain limitations of this study. We focused solely on the Hail Region of Saudi Arabia, which may limit the generalisabil- ity of the findings to other regions or countries. Fur- thermore, the study relied on self-reported measures from respondents, which may introduce response biases. Future research should consider longitudinal designs and include a broader geographical scope to enhance the generalisability of findings.

Table 1. Factors influencing preference for virtual clinics.
ItemFrequencyPercent
Avoid crowded waiting rooms7048.5
I do not need to leave work to go to the clinic5720.7
I do not need transport to go to the clinic4915
Total18784.2
Table 2. Patient satisfaction with virtual clinic experience.
ItemFrequencyPercent
The ability to book an appointment for the same day and at any time I want.167.2
I want a prescription only.146.3
I want to confirm the diagnosis I have in mind for my problem.73.2
The ability to book an appointment without driving to the clinic.2310.4
I can get a diagnosis for my problem without being in a waiting room with other patients.12656.8
Total18683.8
Table 3. Patient dissatisfaction with virtual clinic experience.
ItemFrequencyPercent
I want to meet the health practitioner face to face.3814.9
I do not think that the health practitioner can diagnose my condition virtually.239.4
I had a bad experience with the remote appointment service2531.2
I feel uncomfortable when I speak with a health practitioner that I do not know.9562.6
Total18784.2
Table 4. Impact of virtual clinics on healthcare providers.
ItemFrequency Percent
Increased convenience for patients27 38.0
Reduced overhead costs for providers9 12.7
Expanded access to care for patients in remote orunderserved areas 35 49.3
Total71 100.0
Table 5. Physicians’ perspectiveson virtual clinics.
ItemFrequency Percent
Increased convenience for patients27 38.0
Reduced overhead costs for providers9 12.7
Expanded access to care for patients in remote orunderserved areas 35 49.3
Total71 100.0
implementing meticulous regulation and oversightsignificant majority of physicians surveyed (n = 79,
of virtual healthcare practices.83.1%) have embraced the use of virtual clinics for
A majority of respondents (n = 197) deemed themedical care.
information provided by virtual clinics to beIV. DISCUSSION
convenient ing said 69.8% a high information. of level (50.9%), respondents of confidence Furthermore, while acknowledged simultaneously in the an authenticity overwhelming knowing express- ofsights clinics The into findings in the the Hail efficiency of Region our study and of acceptance provide Saudi valuable Arabia. of virtual The in-
someone clinics, word prehensions of which mouth who have in has underscores driving been utilised raised adoption. the the pertaining services influential Nonetheless, to of privacy, role remote ap- ofmajority virtual time-saving slightly ibl clinics, higher of respondents i potential. than highlighting the ifi global This expressed i li their preference average, i convenience a preference indicating d rate i and was for a l
Patient satisfaction with virtual clinic services waswhich involve the transmission of personal and
high, with reduced wait times, easy access to health-sensitive health information.
care professionals and the convenience of receiving
Age range of participants.
Figure 1. Age range of participants.

References

  1. Wootton R. Twenty years of telemedicine in chronic disease management–an evidence syn- thesis. J Telemed Telecare. 2012 Jun;18(4):211- 20. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2012.120219. PMID: 22674020; PMCID: PMC3366107.
  2. Bokolo Anthony Jnr. Use of Telemedicine and Virtual Care for Remote Treatment in Response to COVID-19 Pandemic. J Med Syst. 2020 Jun 15;44(7):132. doi: 10.1007/s10916-020-01596-
  3. PMID: 32542571; PMCID: PMC7294764.
  4. Alotaibi YK, Federico F. The impact of health information technology on patient safety. Saudi Med J. 2017 Dec;38(12):1173-1180. doi: 10.15537/smj.2017.12.20631. PMID: 29209664; PMCID: PMC5787626.
  5. Elawady A, Khalil A, Assaf O, Toure S, Cas- sidy C. Telemedicine during COVID-19: a survey of Health Care Professionals’ perceptions. Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease, Archivio Monaldi per le Malattie del Torace. 2020 Sep;90(4). DOI: 10.4081/monaldi.2020.1528. PMID: 32959627.
  6. Langarizadeh M, Moghbeli F, Aliabadi A. Application of Ethics for Providing Telemedicine Services and Information Technology. Med Arch. 2017 Oct;71(5):351-355. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2017.71.351-
  7. PMID: 29284905; PMCID: PMC5723167
  8. Dorsey ER, Topol EJ. State of Telehealth. N 14;375(2):154 Jul 2016 Med. Engl J -61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1601705. PMID: 27410924

Get alerts

Be told when JMLPH publishes new research in medicine, law and public health.

  • Email alerts. Register with the journal — registered readers receive the table of contents by email for each new issue. Already registered? Turn alerts on under notification settings.
  • Feed. Subscribe in any reader: Atom · RSS
  • Citation alerts. This article's DOI is registered with Crossref, so reference managers and Crossref's Cited-by service will report new work citing it.

How to Cite

Assessment of the Efficiency of Virtual Clinics in Hail Hospitals, Saudi Arabia. (2023). The Journal of Medicine, Law & Public Health, 3(4), 289-294. https://doi.org/10.52609/jmlph.v3i3.94

Article information

Section
Original Articles
Published
November 26, 2023
Copyright
© 2023 Omar Habib Alshammari, Hasna Mohammed Al-towhere, Anwar Bstan Alanazi, Arwa Sami AlFuhaid, Khuzama Ibrahim AlMoammar, Abdullah Atef Al-Ruwaidi, Naif Hammad Alshammari, Mohamed Ali Alzain. Published open access under CC BY 4.0.
Preservation
Deposited in the PKP Preservation Network

This reading version is rendered from the published PDF, which remains the version of record. Where the two differ, the PDF governs.

How to Cite

Assessment of the Efficiency of Virtual Clinics in Hail Hospitals, Saudi Arabia. (2023). The Journal of Medicine, Law & Public Health, 3(4), 289-294. https://doi.org/10.52609/jmlph.v3i3.94